Marino: "The abuse of Government Milleproroghe IVF '
Corriere della Sera - February 12, 2011
An amendment provides that the centers should send data to the Ministry of Health. "We respond to the EU directive"
LONDON - The Centers for Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) must submit their data to the Ministry of Health which will forward them to the Institute of Health and the National Transplant Centre (CNT) . It includes an amendment by Senator Lucio Malan content in the decree "milleproroghe" approved Friday in the Senate. The Ministry will prepare a decree defining the procedures for disclosure of such information by qualified facilities "for the purpose of forwarding, both in aggregate and disaggregate it." An initiative that responds to an EU directive, said the director of the CNT Alessandro Nanni Costa, whereby the data stream refers to two directions: the first concerns the procedures for quality, safety and traceability of the individual center, the second related to the overall activity of the center and regional activity that are used to understand how the law as a whole. In other words, to understand, through the national register provided for by law 40, as the legislation is applied in the area.
MARINO 'ABUSE' - But Senator Ignazio Marino of the PD amendment sees a risk of abuse, because it may jeopardize the privacy of women and result in possible "profiling." As explained on the need to respond to an EU directive, said, "is an abuse of the government and a serious matter that highlights a double irregularities. On the one hand there is the legal instrument used to insert new rules: a law whose sole purpose is to extend the term of the report to Parliament, are actually inserted matter content on a highly sensitive issue such as the artificial insemination. The other - he said - one is amazed by the vagueness of the terminology used in the amendment when it is said that the centers of PMA will send "required data" to the Ministry of Health, but does not set any limits to possible profiling by the Ministry with name and surname of the people who undergo the treatment of PMA giving freedom to the government (if this provision were to be approved) to know every detail of personnel who use this technique, this is different from collecting data to assess efficiency and effectiveness of treatments. If this was the real target could write clearly limits to the collection of information. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment