Repubblica - 3 febbraio 2011
Coniugi di Parma avevano chiesto, sulla base di una sentenza della Corte europea dei Diritti dell'uomo, che fosse ordinato in via d'urgenza al ginecologo a cui si erano rivolti di effettuare l'eterologa
Il tribunale di Milano ha eccepito l'incostituzionalità della legge sulla procreazione medicalmente assistita, la cosiddetta legge 40, e ha inviato gli atti alla Consulta. Alla base della decisione la tesi secondo cui la norma, laddove vieta la fecondazione eterologa e prevede sanzioni alle strutture che dovessero praticarla, "non garantisce alle coppie cui viene diagnosticato un quadro clinico di sterilità irreversibile il diritto fondamentale the full realization of family privacy. "
The judges of the First Civil Chamber, refer the matter to the Constitutional Court - as well as a few months ago was made in Florence and Catania - have upheld an appeal by a young couple from Parma, assisted by a team of lawyers. The couple, before last summer, had requested, based on a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in a case brought by some infertile couples against Austria, he was ordained as a urgency to the gynecologist who had turned to heterologous insemination is due to the complete and irreversible infertility of her husband, on the basis of the Strasbourg ruling. Alternatively, a husband and wife had asked to raise the objection before the consultation. Judges in Milan, as did their colleagues in recent months in Florence and Catania, have chosen this second way.
0 comments:
Post a Comment