Corriere della Sera - October 6, 2010
Doubts constitutional ban on all'eterologa raised during a trial in Florence
LONDON - The first section of the Civil Court of Florence has raised doubts rule on the constitutionality of the law on artificial insemination (Law 40) with which prohibits infertile couples have access to heterologous fertilization, using eggs or sperm donated by people outside the couple. The lawyers have announced Filomena Gallo and Gianni Baldini, assisting spouses who made the request. The man suffers from a lack of sperm caused by treatments made in adolescence. Back quindi alla Corte Costituzionale la legge 40 sulla fecondazione assistita.
SECONDO RINVIO - È il secondo rinvio alla Consulta sulla legge 40, sempre del Tribunale di Firenze, che già due anni fa si rivolse ai giudici costituzionali i quali accolsero il rilievo eliminando l'obbligo di produzione di soli tre embrioni in ogni ciclo di fecondazione, l'obbligo del loro contemporaneo impianto, e annullando anche il divieto di congelamento degli embrioni in sovrannumero. In questo caso invece, per la prima volta, un giudice ordinario ritiene quindi costituzionalmente illegittimo il divieto di procreazione assistita di tipo eterologo, sospende il processo, e rimette gli atti alla Corte. La coppia, dopo essere stata in cura in Svizzera e in altri centri foreigners, to no avail, it turned Luca Coscioni Association. Their goal is to perform the treatment in Italy.
Manifesto unreasonableness "-" The judge has recognized the demands raised by the couple after finding profiles of manifest unreasonableness of the absolute prohibition of heterologous for the apparent discrepancy means-ends'. It is as explained by Professor Gianni Baldini, who together with the lawyer Filomena Gallo assist the spouses in the application. The couple had asked for help after learning of the case of Austria, which had been condemned by the European Court of Human Rights concerning the prohibition of heterologous own. "We decided to take up this challenge - the lawyer says Gallo - despite being the most difficult of all is that necessary to rewrite the law 40 because we felt the time was right now and that we were finally making a European sensibility to this problem as evidenced by the Nobel in Stockholm gave to Edwards, which recognizes how this drug actually collect claims and aspirations profoundly human. "
Secretary - "It is now clear that in respect of Law 40 is a Scripting of some courts. Not on marginal points but aiming to dismantle the structure of the law. Tell yourself that you want to return to the Far West "is the Undersecretary of Health, Eugenia Roccella, who said it, after learning of the order of the judges. "We want it to hit the popular will because, among other things, was one of the heterologous submitted to referendum vote," said Roccella (actually the 2005 referendum did not achieve a quorum, but prevailed among the voters clearly favor the amendments to the Law, ed.) "They're dark 'as Roccella, the reasons that brought the law 40 on the Consulta fertilization. "The reasons also seem insignificant, because it is unreasonable to say that the rule is not a question of law." The risk of a second Roccella deregulation is very high: "The international market has led to a heterologous oocyte with racist connotations e sfruttamento di giovani donne che hanno portato anche alla morte. Anche la questione dell'anominato nella fecondazione eterologa - dove appunto il seme o l'ovulo arriva da un donatore esterno - è particolarmente grave perché conoscere i propri genitori biologici oltre ad essere un diritto umano è un diritto alla salute perché si ottengono informazioni preziose».
DELLA VEDOVA (FLI) - Diverso il parere di Benedetto Della Vedova, vice capogruppo vicario alla Camera di Fli, intervistato da Radio 24: quella sulla fecondazione assistita, afferma il deputato finiano, è una legge «sbagliata» che la Consulta, con il nuovo ricorso, «smonterà» ancora, ma in Futuro e libertà «non ci sono ortodossie». On the topic, he adds, "there ourselves as a group, there are views of individual members. Personally - it continues - I think for some time that this law is wrong, by radical I worked for the referendum "to which" Fini voted yes to three questions out of four. I believe that this law shows that when you want to go against the rationality often goes against the law. This has happened with the Constitutional Court has removed the law in its most abstruse and I also removed the ban will be heterologous. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment